Canon XTI Kit Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare
 |
Canon XTI Kit Prices, Reviews, Sales, Compare.
Product: Canon XTI Kit Amazon Price: Too low to display Availability: In Stock |
Compare Prices on Canon XTI Kit
[This is the same review I posted for the kit. If you're getting the body because you don't like the 18-55 lens, preserve in mind that some dealers offer this camera in a kit with the remarkable nicer 17-85 USM IS (image stabalization) zoom.]
The novel Digital Rebel XTi camera should appeal to a wide variety of users: those wishing to upgrade from a point & shoot digital, or those wishing to improve upon their first generation digital SLRs. Features and value build this a 5-star camera, but it won't be everyone's cup of tea.
Compared to the previous Digital Rebel XT, vital improvements are:
1) 10.1 megapixels. In digital camera circles, this is like saying a car has more horsepower than an older car. While this alone doesn't mean "better" pictures, in reality, combined with other improvements in hardware & software, the results typically are better.;
2) 2.5" LCD panel. This alone has more than one advantage. The certain first one is that our pictures eye larger in review. The second, and for someone approaching 50 (like myself), is that the LCD is now broken-down for all the camera's data (shutter hurry, aperture, shots left, etc.) . It's great easier to read than the little LCD typically located on the top of the cameras. It might utilize up the batteries quicker, but, heck, if you can notice the info this mighty easier, then so be it. One complaint, it does not appear that the data rotates when you do verticals (like the Sony Alpha 100) .;
3) 9-point AF. The number of points are improved from 7, but the steady key here is that it's the system from the 30D, which had a noteworthy higher degree of accuracy than the previous Rebels.;
4) Characterize Styles. I didn't really indulge in them at first, but simply attach, this is like the days of film, when we could exercise a "portrait" film or "landscape" film. For those that don't like to do a lot of computer work, these can be VERY handy in getting the accurate glance in the camera.;
5) Dust cleaning system. OK, I assume the dust scrape will probably be a dinky overblown, now that Canon offers a solution, but it is a loyal, if not colossal, threat. Additionally, the map Canon has implemented it is second to none. The first is through hardware. An ultrasonic filter can simply shake the dust off. Second is through software. If you region a immoral part that won't shake off, you can do a reference shot, and have the dust removed by software on your computer.;
6) The grip has been improved a minute. The rubber on the grip is improved, and an anti-slip strip has been placed on the assist where the factual thumb goes.
Most all other things Canon is know for composed exists. The camera focus posthaste and quietly. Camera operations are mercurial and easy to locate and utilize. Pictures sight gigantic.
Now for the other side. This is an unique time in that all the expansive players are comming out with a 10 megapixel camera at the same time, so the Canon has some stiff competition. Here goes a simple comparison.
1) Compared to the other two cameras already available, the Sony A100 and Nikon D80 (both also 5-star cameras), the XTi is considerably smaller, and somewhat lighter. Some will like this, even some with medium to medium-large hands. But most people with larger, and some with somewhat smaller hands may lift the other two choices.;
2) The battery is somewhat smaller than its rival's, and may drain a bit faster due to the LCD being old-fashioned for info all the time.;
3) Functionally, the rear LCD is not as nice as the Sony's. The Sony's rotates, can be location to enlarged type (50+ user again), and the system that turns it off as your peruse approaches also starts the AF on the Sony. [Although many like the top LCD, the Nikon map of needing to push a button on the aid, then peak over the top to watch what you're setting is not as nice].;
4) No in camera stabalization. The A100 can shift the sensor to back eliminate camera shake. Nikon and Canon require you to lift rather expensive lenses to catch the anti-shake.;
Also, soon to be added to the competion will be the Pentax K10D. Specs are sketchy legal now, but it appears to be enter the competition as a 10 megapixel camera with built-in anti-shake (noteworthy like their K100D) .
Of these 3 currently on the market, the Canon is the least expensive; therefore, it's up to the other 2 to demonstrate they are worth more, a very difficult task, indeed.
You'll gather plenty of technical reviews on the web regarding features and specs for this camera.
The best thing I believe I can provide is my short experience with this camera, so if you aged to have a high destroy P&S camera and is looking to dive into the DSLR world, you are where I was a few weeks ago.
I owned a Sony F717 which I really loved, but honestly, all I did was place it to Auto and grasp top-notch pictures. The quandary was that I had a toddler at home that doesn't really like to wait till the camera took a few secs to focus and acquire the pic. I was missing those smiles and moments fair because the Sony couldn't consume pics expeditiously enough.
I decided to peruse into newer cameras... Initially my budget was around $400 and I was looking to occupy the Canon S3. But after spending several weeks online reading reviews (like you probably are honest now), I decided that I wanted a DSLR (you'll earn plenty of technical reasons in the web and other reviews) . I was then ready to retract the Canon Xt (But the Xti was unprejudiced around the corner, so I decided to wait a couple more weeks and when the Xti was finally released on Sep 1st, I went to Best Engage and got mine)
It's my third week with the camera, and I'm loving it. I can steal pictures of my son faster than he can say "bugga bugga bugga". While I'm mild learning how to exercise the camera to its potential (I've been trying to learn how to shoot pictures in manual mode instead of beefy automatic), I've been fully delighted with the results so far.
If you're doing what I did last month, you're probably reading tons of reviews of this camera, the Canon Xt, Nikon D50, Nikon D70, Nikon D80, etc. Don't slay your time on the details.. They're all advantageous cameras, and if you're coming from P&S, any of these cameras will be an awesome one for you to learn.
I warn you though. The biggest inconvenience of buying this camera is that you'll soon be lusting after lenses... Now I consume hours on the web checking reviews of Canon, Sigma and Tamron lenses, and possess it or not, it's considerable harder to retract lenses than to occupy a camera.
PS: A Large book I I got was "Plan Exposure" by Bryan Peterson. I actually got the book before the camera, and it was one of the main deciding factors that got me into DSLR instead of a pro P&S. The pictures that Bryan shows in this book are astonishing and you need control. Now I'm paranoid with getting the smallest Depth of Field possible in my son's pictures (You'll understand this if you catch this book or any other that explains concepts of Exposure)
Update (10/04) : After weeks digging forums and reviews, I decided to remove 2 lenses... The canon 50 f1.8 and the canon 70-300 IS. I'm not going to go over the details for these lenses in this review, but wanted to let you guys know that deciding which camera was the easy share. Deciding the lenses is where all the afflict resides.
I had the Rebel XT and about 8 lenses and was thinking of getting an upgraded second camera body. So when it came out the 30D was a logical choice, but it was not really noteworthy of an upgrade from the 20D, which I resisted, so I was not really obvious what to do. Then I had all but decided to objective assume the tumble and derive the 30D when I heard the first rumblings about the XTi.
Then I started to learn the details about the XTi, more mega pixels, same auto focus, same cover, represent styles, dust cleaning! The only areas that the 30D won in my view were compose quality, station meter, and estimated shutter life. Those 3 categories were not enough to convince me that the 30D was worth $300-$400 more than the XTi especially since the XTi had won or tied in most categories. The arrangement I ogle at it is that the camera bodies are not nearly as significant as the lenses, they change so hasty that it is not worth it to me to utilize more for longevity when it will be outdated in a year anyway. Expend $1,500 on a lens, spend it for a lifetime, exercise $1,500 on a camera body, regret it in a year. I fully question the upgrade to the 30D to be released within a year, and now that I have saved by getting the XTi I will have all that great more to attach towards it when it comes out.
So basically what I am saying is that, in my notion, the XTi is fair as grand, if not better than the semi-pro 30D, so why pay more? Switching from the XT to the XTi was very simple, I can consume them both now without any problems. The batteries, battery grips, remote shutter release, and most of the other accessories are also compatible with both, which is nice to retain the amount of gear you need to carry to a minimum.
Unless you want to proceed up to a pudgy frame sensor, I can't scrutinize any reasons why you would not want to go with this camera. If you read books on photography from unprejudiced 1 or 2 years ago you will realize that this "entry level" camera has features that were not even available on top of the line ($5,000+) camera bodies. With the urge that camera bodies reach you might as well lift the entry level body every year instead of making a titanic investment in the pro level bodies and then being shown up by something 10% of that mark in a year or two. Not that there are not reasons to remove one of those bodies, I unprejudiced don't seem have any of them.
